Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources.
A common analogy of this is the Watchmaker Argument, which was given by William Paley The argument goes as follows.
If you found a watch in an empty field, you would logically conclude that it was designed and not the product of random formation. Likewise, when we look at life and the universe, it is natural to conclude there is a designer since we see how perfectly the universe and life forms operate.
The eye is typically used as an example of design.
|An encyclopedia of philosophy articles written by professional philosophers.||Search The Teleological Argument Teleological arguments are arguments from the order in the universe to the existence of God.|
|teleological argument||The German philosopher Christian von Wolff coined the term in the Latin form "teleologia" in in his work Philosophia rationalis, sive logica. Platonic[ edit ] In the PhaedoPlato through Socrates argues that true explanations for any given physical phenomenon must be teleological.|
|The Teleological Argument||Explain whether laws of nature are discovered or whether they are invented.|
|www.philosophyofreligion.info||History[ edit ] While the concept of an intelligence behind the natural order is ancient, a rational argument that concludes that we can know that the natural world has a designer, or a creating intelligence which has human-like purposes, appears to have begun with classical philosophy.|
|Paley's argument is as follows:||It is called Intelligent Design Theory.|
It is a marvelous development. In order for it to work, there must be many different convergent parts that individually have no function but have value only in a designed whole.
It is only in the combined total that they exhibit their total function. This function is by design. Human artifacts are products of intelligent design. The universe resembles human artifacts. Therefore the universe is a product of intelligent design.
But the universe is complex and gigantic in comparison to human artifacts. Therefore, there probably is a powerful and vastly intelligent designer who created the universe.
Strengths of the argument This argument is simple to understand and has merit since humans are designers by nature, and it is natural to think in terms of things having purpose. It is also consistent with Rom. Even though the unbeliever suppresses the truth of God in his unrighteousness Rom.
Additionally, evolutionists have difficulty accounting for apparent design in objects like the eye, the heart, and the brain where many different parts come together to form the whole.
These individual parts have no purpose except in the function of the whole. How can evolution account for these detailed congruent occurrences? Weaknesses of the argument The idea that the universe is designed is subjective. Different observations in the natural world can produce different theories to account for their existence.
Also, this proof is built upon an analogy. If we find things in the universe that are chaotic, then by analogy, that would imply there is no designer. Baker Book House, The teleological argument is an attempt to prove the existence of God that begins with the observation of the purposiveness of nature.
The teleological argument moves to the conclusion that there must exist a designer. Apr 25, · Last week we introduced Thomas Aquinas’s four cosmological arguments for the existence of god; today we introduce his fifth argument: the teleological argument.
Teleological arguments are arguments from the order in the universe to the existence of God.
They are also known as arguments from design (or, to be precise, arguments to design). The name “the teleological argument” is derived from the Greek word telos, meaning “end” or “purpose”.
The Teleological Argument is also known as the "argument from design." Quite simply, it states that a designer must exist since the universe and living things exhibit marks of design in their order, consistency, unity, and pattern.
William Paley, "The Teleological Argument" Abstract: William Paley's teleological or analogical watch-maker argument is sketched together with some objections to .
the argument for the existence of God based on the assumption that order in the universe implies an orderer and cannot be a natural feature of the universe.
Show More Also called argument from design, teleological proof.